Do as I say, do not do as I do

This is probably the mantra all politicians have. There are plenty of examples of this, the latest being the furore about the (in)famous Ms Rayner’s liking for property. I suppose on its own there is nothing wrong with buying a house. If you haven’t got the money, just get a mortgage or a rich benefactor. For me the questions concerning her issue is simple. Two things spring to mind, '1. Taxes and 2. Where did the money come from'. Bearing in mind the lady is always happily mentioning her very poor upbringing. In my mind such situations tend to last a lifetime. Unless you do something about it. Obviously in her case she did,. She joined the Labour party. The Wiki says: She later trained in social care at Stockport College and worked for the local council as a care worker. She eventually became a trade union representative within Unison. Knowing for myself how difficult it is to raise your head above the parapet, one would have to applaud her for at least having done that. The only problem here though is that it is dangerous. You start thinking you can do anything, the rules do not apply to you. After all, aren’t you the one that MAKES the rules?

Look at Trumpy baby. Same thing but bigger. I am not going to mention Mr Human Relations Expert Starmer except to say he is not in the self-made category. He just waltzed into the job and may well waltz out before long. That’s what lawyers do. When looking at today’s world leading politicians it is quite evident there is a lack of perception about what life means. What to be human means in the scheme of things. That lack of understanding translates into ‘macho’ behaviour, some would call it ‘grandstanding’. They all suffer it and coupled with the idea that they are the only ones who know what to do and how to do it. The general population just to follow and keep ‘schtum’. These situations can be observed throughout the world, some stronger than others. It is true to say generally speaking people usually want strong leadership. Meaning strong leadership keeps the multi-faceted population working together. If the leadership starts virtue-signalling, such as been happening in the UK then the ‘togetherness’ falls apart. If you don’t know what I mean by that, hear the words of our much loved PM Waltzing Starmer "trans women are women, and that is not just my view - that is actually the law". Coupled with, “Women therefore can have penises”. Another thing is, yes it is the law but who made that law? I didn't! Well, it is at least 0.1 percent according to him. If we say the UK population stands at 70 million then according to the Office for National Statistics there are 34,214,835 females so according to present government thinking there are 35,000 females with penises in the UK. Obviously Keir knows a few as London seems to be the hotbed of penis bearing females. Lovely why not, I am now waiting for the statistics of vagina bearing males. Don’t ask where such a physical would be, perhaps on the shoulder blades or just above the belly button? I don’t know, I am not a politician. The question however remains people! Perhaps Trump has an answer?